| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
skatethewake247 Pop Shuvit

Joined: 04 Feb 2004 Posts: 172 City: nova
|
Posted: Dec 04, 2004 8:01 pm Post subject: bi-level |
|
|
how heavy is the bi-level. i saw it in a mag and it looks like it woulb be so heavy. if anyone has rode one say how heavy you thought it was
_________________ www.asylumwakeskatesnow.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Morphine Backside 180

Joined: 03 Jun 2004 Posts: 1207 City: 706omg
|
Posted: Dec 04, 2004 8:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Search for the damn near infinite topics on this, please.
But to help you out, cause we're cool like that, it's heavy, but not bad heavy, it ends up being pretty sweet.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
haggard7 Frontside 180

Joined: 09 Oct 2004 Posts: 254
|
Posted: Dec 04, 2004 8:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
its not as heavy as you think but once you ride it, the pop makes up for any weight problems, the cataylst is alot heavier than the bi level
_________________ GREAT ODEN'S RAVEN!!!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CABLERIDER Backside 180


Joined: 16 Sep 2004 Posts: 685 City: lighthouse point
|
Posted: Dec 04, 2004 8:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Jacob, yeah the catlyst is the heaviest board i ever picked up
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
haggard7 Frontside 180

Joined: 09 Oct 2004 Posts: 254
|
Posted: Dec 04, 2004 8:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i know, why would brian want such a heavy board i mean i can understand so it wont blow away but that thign wouldnt move if a tornado hit it
_________________ GREAT ODEN'S RAVEN!!!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CABLERIDER Backside 180


Joined: 16 Sep 2004 Posts: 685 City: lighthouse point
|
Posted: Dec 04, 2004 8:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| my karma is kinda heavy and all but it still worx really well and i like it alot, i heard the byerly was really heavy too
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BillyOLDS Kickflip


Joined: 19 Sep 2003 Posts: 3698 City: orlando/winterpark
|
Posted: Dec 04, 2004 8:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| the bilev is heavy but it makes it a lot easier to control, especially in a lil wind and big tricks
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lhsxc22 Pop Shuvit

Joined: 26 Aug 2004 Posts: 145 City: Elgin
|
Posted: Dec 04, 2004 9:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| how heavy is the k-39 compared to other skates
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
itch Frontside 180


Joined: 18 Feb 2004 Posts: 471 City: Battle Creek
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
scott a "a" is for angel

Joined: 17 Feb 2004 Posts: 4126
|
Posted: Dec 05, 2004 5:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Jacob wrote: | | that thign wouldnt move if a tornado hit it | hahahahahaha ohhhhh man its sooo funny....because its TRUE!
somehow that mo fo weights in at like 10 lbs....i know its double glassed, but holy macaroni,,,
_________________ facebook.com/TheLiquidPlayground
www.integrity-wake.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wakesk8r9610 Backside 180

Joined: 23 Sep 2003 Posts: 1267
|
Posted: Dec 05, 2004 3:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| CABLERIDER, byerly catalyst are the same thing. different sizes.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zack Backside 180

Joined: 26 Sep 2004 Posts: 679 City: lhp
|
Posted: Dec 05, 2004 3:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hey it is heavy
_________________ Zack |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
seven11dmd Backside 180


Joined: 19 Apr 2004 Posts: 2427 City: Northern VA
|
Posted: Dec 05, 2004 4:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
sooo if the bi level pop makes up for the weight, then wouldnt it still be similar, you can pop higher but its harder to spin stuff....so whats really the point? if it just "makes up for it" then why not ride a mono-level board
_________________ JMU |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Morphine Backside 180

Joined: 03 Jun 2004 Posts: 1207 City: 706omg
|
Posted: Dec 05, 2004 4:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| It's not any harder to spin. I can ollie like a foot higher with the bilevel, so it doesn't just make up for the weight, it does more. The main point is, yes dammit, it's heavy, but you won't have any problems with it.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
haggard7 Frontside 180

Joined: 09 Oct 2004 Posts: 254
|
Posted: Dec 05, 2004 5:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| wakesk8r9610 wrote: | | CABLERIDER, byerly catalyst are the same thing. different sizes. |
wakesk8r, actually they are two totally different boards, first off the byerly on comes in a 107, and the catalyst comes in a 112 and 116, plus, the concave, the tail and nose width, and the way they are weighted are completely different
_________________ GREAT ODEN'S RAVEN!!!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nick_Sh Pop Shuvit

Joined: 12 Dec 2003 Posts: 107
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
haggard7 Frontside 180

Joined: 09 Oct 2004 Posts: 254
|
Posted: Dec 05, 2004 5:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
they were pretty similar last year not identical, i didnt know we were talking bout 04's
_________________ GREAT ODEN'S RAVEN!!!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
scott a "a" is for angel

Joined: 17 Feb 2004 Posts: 4126
|
Posted: Dec 05, 2004 6:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nick_Sh, the catalyst/byerly were redesigned this year. they are double glassed, have blunt(er) edges, have a different foam pattern on top, and they have weighting like jacob mentioned. if im not mistaken the byerly has lead running down the center of the board (a la integrity) and the catalyst has only the tip/tails weighted. the concave is changed, and when i stood on it, it felt like ass. there is some kind of lump running down the center of the board. who knows what that is for...im thinking there might be a few more changes, but thats the gist of the more obvious stuff. perhaps jacob can give us a rundown of the board since i havent had the oppurtunity to talk with the norcal rep about it just yet.
_________________ facebook.com/TheLiquidPlayground
www.integrity-wake.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
haggard7 Frontside 180

Joined: 09 Oct 2004 Posts: 254
|
Posted: Dec 05, 2004 6:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
scott, u pretty much got it, the weighting, the funky concave, the hump, the rounder edges, and the glass
_________________ GREAT ODEN'S RAVEN!!!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CABLERIDER Backside 180


Joined: 16 Sep 2004 Posts: 685 City: lighthouse point
|
Posted: Dec 05, 2004 6:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Jacob, yeah i was gonna say we were talking about the 05s
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|