Reopen the 9/11 investigation!

parm · Posted: Sep 12, 2009 12:11 am Post subject:

skimboarder, You better believe we're serious. I'm not a "conspiracy theorist". These are real questions that need to be addressed.

WT7 had small fires on a few floors. Watch the collapse. If you don't see a controlled demolition then please tell me what happened. You must be an expert in this field just like the 9/11 commission investigators who admit they were told to keep quiet.

Try and think for yourself next time before you recite what you saw on CNN like a sheep.

http://www.examiner.com/x-14613-Kansas-City-Headlines-Examiner~y2009m9d11-911-Commission-faced-obstruction-deception

parm · Posted: Sep 12, 2009 12:20 am Post subject:

from http://usa.mediamonitors.net/content/view/full/66202

On April 6, 2009 Copenhagen’s Channel-2 News interviewed a Danish Scientist, Niels Harrit, professor of Chemistry at the University of Copenhagen, regarding a well-researched article he and eight other scientists had just published in the respected peer-reviewed Open Chemical Physics Journal. Through their research, the scientists offered incontrovertible proof that the dust from the Twin Towers and Building-7 of the World Trade Centre contained small intact samples of un-reacted nanothermite. Professor Harrit referred to it as the “loaded gun” as opposed to merely the “smoking” gun, insisting that their work was based on scientific evidence compiled over a period of two years and not on speculation or “conspiracy” theories. Traces of nano-thermite were discovered when molten steel from the three buildings, collected within 10 minutes of one building’s collapse, was retrieved and later examined under microscope. To their astonishment, the scientists discovered traces of nanothermite.

NANO THERMITE FOUND IN THE DUST, WHAT MORE EVIDENCE DO YOU WANT?

scott a · "a" is for angel Joined: 17 Feb 2004 Posts: 4126

parm · Posted: Sep 12, 2009 1:33 am Post subject:

scott a, No I'm not, that's why I stated in my previous post that this should be investigated by experts.

Can anyone who disagrees attempt to answer some questions about the facts instead of attacking me?

dylo · Posted: Sep 12, 2009 4:59 am Post subject:

where's pirate when you need him

stompin9s · Posted: Sep 12, 2009 6:39 am Post subject:

i wish they would re-open the investigation
fire does not make 2 buildings fall straight down.

controlled demolition does

gporter · Posted: Sep 12, 2009 9:43 am Post subject:

RedShred14, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BUJwHlWT6Fs&NR=1&feature=fvwp

Is that you?

skimboarder · Posted: Sep 12, 2009 12:19 pm Post subject:

i think it's the other way around there buddy. you're the one reciting controlled demolition like a sheep. i'm the one thinking logically and bringing in other examples.

if it was a controlled demolition how did not one person working at WTC notice the months of preperation for it? how did they tear out and cut steal beams inside the WTC while placing demolitions without anybody asking? i don't believe the nano thermite bulljive either. i saw a whole show of nano thermite trying to burn through steal, it never happened. by the way thermite is just a chemical reaction, the same reaction that happens in a fourth of july sparkler.

controlled demolition doesn't just happen overnight by throwing some charges or whatever demolition you plan to use in a building. it takes a long time for even a small building to be prepared for demolition, let alone two skyscrapers like WTC 1 and 2.

As i stated before, the truth could be right in front of a conspiracy theorist and they wouldn't accept it. and i see that your a flight student so that must make you an expert in this matter as far as the planes hitting the buildilng and calls being made from them, which by the way you never addressed.

gporter · Posted: Sep 12, 2009 3:02 pm Post subject:

very real, very disturbing...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CYZqQWfGIJg

4:35

Timebomb · Posted: Sep 12, 2009 5:13 pm Post subject:

parm · Posted: Sep 12, 2009 8:09 pm Post subject:

Timebomb, Jet Fuel burning does not "cause reactions of nano thermite"

The traces of the explosive were leftover and therefore had not reacted.

So please if you will tell me wtf they were doing there?

knox · Kickflip Joined: 14 Jun 2007 Posts: 4693 City: Gainesville

occum's razor=the simplest solution is usually the right one

Planes ran into buildings, and the buildings fell.

skimboarder · Posted: Sep 12, 2009 11:18 pm Post subject:

i'm bringing this from the other thread just to see what redshred has to say.

everyone says that a steel building has never been brought down by fire. correct. but how many steel buildings have been hit by 250,000 pound jet airliners with tons of jet fuel traveling almost 600 mph?

i think the nano-thermite being found is irrelevant.

olyripper · Ollie Joined: 25 Apr 2005 Posts: 55 City: olympia

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6bdr_2IAJWU

dylo · Posted: Sep 13, 2009 2:42 am Post subject:

stompin9s · Posted: Sep 13, 2009 9:07 am Post subject:

this one is pretty cut and dry
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iEuJimaumW4

taku · Kickflip Joined: 10 Mar 2007 Posts: 2868 City: Central FL

gporter · Posted: Sep 13, 2009 10:46 am Post subject:

stompin9s, It didn't fall into its foot print, and if you listen to the video I posted, the firefighters said that they could not prevent it from collapsing, the fires on the inside of the building were too much to prevent the structure from collapsing...

It did not fall into it's footprint. That is a lie and not actually what happened.

Watch this video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sGAoRrBoPRM&NR=1&feature=fvwp

dylo · Posted: Sep 13, 2009 10:54 am Post subject:

gporter · Posted: Sep 13, 2009 11:12 am Post subject:

dylo, You do realize two sky scrapers over 100 stories tall had just collapsed right next to the building itself, it caught fire, and from the inside out, could not be put out, whether or not they decided to "pull" it, it still had to come down.