| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
ORIONtheHUNTER Faceplant

Joined: 06 Aug 2007 Posts: 27 City: oldest city!
|
Posted: Apr 23, 2008 10:35 pm Post subject: 07 Catalyst v. 07 Catalyst 2.0 |
|
|
So I have been looking for a new compression molded board for the new season starting, and I have been looking at these. The regular catalyst is $10 cheaper, and I am open to the grip/foam combo. I was just wondering what you guys think is a all around better board. I am looking for a compression molded because right now I am riding a Kampus K39, which I love, but is slowly deteriorating and is giving me a bit of a hard time going W2W. Another reason I like the Catalyst is that it has molded channels, which would help. And I would love to get an Integrity or something, but those are out of my price range. And nothing is even close to being finalized, so I am very open to suggestions. Thanks! _________________ wakeskate low tide, surf high tide. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
amosb72 Pop Shuvit

Joined: 09 Sep 2007 Posts: 200 City: Mandeville
|
Posted: Apr 23, 2008 10:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
vinyls are sick as hell
my friends catalyst is awesome but it rides a little low for me |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Evan71 Kickflip

Joined: 22 Aug 2006 Posts: 3045 City: Santa Barbara
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CapriSunAllNatural Frontside 180


Joined: 26 Sep 2006 Posts: 419 City: Bham, WA
|
Posted: Apr 24, 2008 12:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I have both shapes, I prefer the Caty 2.0 mostly because of size. but the normal Caty is definatley solid, would be my main board if it were 107 and gripped. Its what I learned W2W stuff on. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stOAKed Backside 180


Joined: 28 Oct 2007 Posts: 1946
|
Posted: Apr 24, 2008 7:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
Doesn't the 2.0 have a different shape than the 112. I know that the 2.0 is gripped and the 112 is combo grip/foam. Brian Grubb wanted the board to have grip/foam cause on w2w stuff he said with grip it vibrated too much. _________________ ..........Oak.......... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ORIONtheHUNTER Faceplant

Joined: 06 Aug 2007 Posts: 27 City: oldest city!
|
Posted: Apr 24, 2008 8:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
ok, thanks everyone! CapriSunAllNatural, what do you prefer about the shape of the 2.0? And that is kinda the reason I wanted a board like this, to better my w2w and stuff. Because as long as my K39 holds out, its pretty good for tech tricks and stuff. _________________ wakeskate low tide, surf high tide. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stOAKed Backside 180


Joined: 28 Oct 2007 Posts: 1946
|
Posted: Apr 24, 2008 6:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ORIONtheHUNTER, If you want it for w2w go for it. _________________ ..........Oak.......... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
-LoGiK- Kickflip


Joined: 22 Sep 2005 Posts: 2747 City: Orlando
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CapriSunAllNatural Frontside 180


Joined: 26 Sep 2006 Posts: 419 City: Bham, WA
|
Posted: Apr 24, 2008 8:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think i like the shape of the catalyst better actually, but i wasn't digg'n the size, or the foam. The 2.0 is solid though, it has a more tradional concave, where as the Catalyst's concave goes all the way to the nose and tail. that is why i felt like i had so much more control w2w with the catalyst. THe wider chanels on the catalyst are a little more effective too I think.
But now I'm am doing all my w2w stuff with the 2.0 just as well, I just like the size better, and the grip tape. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CapriSunAllNatural Frontside 180


Joined: 26 Sep 2006 Posts: 419 City: Bham, WA
|
Posted: Apr 24, 2008 8:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oh, also, what i like about the shape of the 2.0:
The WIDE nose and tail! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ORIONtheHUNTER Faceplant

Joined: 06 Aug 2007 Posts: 27 City: oldest city!
|
Posted: Apr 25, 2008 9:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
ok....I think i'm going to go for the regular caty 112. I like that it has concave the full length, and i've found one al ot cheaper then I can find the 2.0. But one last question: they should both hold out about the same in the long run, right? I know they're compression molded but I just want to make sure. Thanks to everyone so much! _________________ wakeskate low tide, surf high tide. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
-LoGiK- Kickflip


Joined: 22 Sep 2005 Posts: 2747 City: Orlando
|
Posted: Apr 25, 2008 10:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
ORIONtheHUNTER, i just told you that i could get you a 2.0 for cheap i mean almost a steal
"ok....I think i'm going to go for the regular caty 112. I like that it has concave the full length, and i've found one al ot cheaper then I can find the 2.0." _________________ www.jimizwakenskate.com
www.dekline.com
www.wesubsist.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ORIONtheHUNTER Faceplant

Joined: 06 Aug 2007 Posts: 27 City: oldest city!
|
Posted: Apr 25, 2008 10:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
well how much are you talking about? _________________ wakeskate low tide, surf high tide. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lollar 360 flip


Joined: 19 Jun 2007 Posts: 8253
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CapriSunAllNatural Frontside 180


Joined: 26 Sep 2006 Posts: 419 City: Bham, WA
|
Posted: Apr 25, 2008 11:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Both my 2.0 and catalyst are the same year, both have hit rails and docks, and both are holding up well. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ORIONtheHUNTER Faceplant

Joined: 06 Aug 2007 Posts: 27 City: oldest city!
|
Posted: Apr 25, 2008 2:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
thanks! EDIT: LoGiK'sboard was alot cheaper, so I may go with the 2.0 instead. _________________ wakeskate low tide, surf high tide. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|