who sucks

haggard7 · Frontside 180 Joined: 09 Oct 2004 Posts: 254

pick one:

A. Bush sucks

B. Kerry sucks

C. They both suck

BillyOLDS · Posted: Oct 13, 2004 9:57 pm Post subject:

why didnt u do a pole? i believe the both suck and kerry is running his campaign around bushs mistakes and thats how hell prob win. PEOPLE NEED TO VOTE FOR SOME1 THEY LIKE NOT AGAINST SOME1 THEY DONT. FOCUS ON WAT THE CANDIDATE HAS TO OFFER AMERICA AND MAKE AN EDUCATED CHOICE ON WAT UVE LEARNED NOT WAT U HAVE HEARD AGAINST BUSH.

nick · Posted: Oct 13, 2004 9:59 pm Post subject:

B. Kerry sucks my sweaty left testicle

W '04

kento911 · Kickflip Joined: 29 Mar 2004 Posts: 3657 City: Phoenix

che blanc, Im with you

god · Ollie Joined: 22 Sep 2004 Posts: 74 City: kio ku kat chu

headhuntermx4, your right but i think bush will win even though i dont want him to, its a lesser of two evils but i think im voting for kerry

Zack · Backside 180 Joined: 26 Sep 2004 Posts: 679 City: lhp

D. NADER FOR PRESIDENT

PIRATE · Guest

ridecable, couldnt agree with you more

satori* · Posted: Oct 14, 2004 6:51 pm Post subject:

F. CONSTITUTIONAL PARTY
VOTE michael peroutka and chuck "robotron" baldwin '04!!!

these really are candidates

and jacob did you do the mock vote in history yet?

BillyOLDS · Posted: Oct 14, 2004 6:55 pm Post subject:

ridecable, no one knows much about him. its stupid, i doubt hell ever win, why doesnt he get more coverage? if i make a lot of money one day i will give a bit to the independants to give them a chance. satori*, who are they/ once again dont vote for people u dont know anything about

satori* · Posted: Oct 14, 2004 7:15 pm Post subject:

who said i didnt know anything about the constitutional party?

also, who said i was seriously supporting the constitutional party?

at least they might not screw up as much as bush...
http://www.vote-smart.org/bio.php?can_id=MZZ26038

plus robotron rules.

-=AlexXx=- · Posted: Oct 14, 2004 7:19 pm Post subject:

D. NADER FOR PRESIDENT
agreed

BillyOLDS · Posted: Oct 14, 2004 7:51 pm Post subject:

i didnt say u didnt but i dont know enough about them to vote for them. i was saying that there isnt anything on the media or just out there on common knowledge. i personaly would vote for nadar but lack of knowledge about them is why i wont.

Guest · Posted: Oct 14, 2004 7:58 pm Post subject:

The Independant Party and the Constitutional parties are so far left or so far right they really stand no chance. Naders policy would turn us into greenpeace country and the constitutional party would undo any advancements this country has made in the last 200 years as well as turn our country into isolationists.

BillyOLDS · Posted: Oct 14, 2004 8:00 pm Post subject:

jd, u have a good point. never thought of that either. good job. one point for u

satori* · Posted: Oct 14, 2004 8:01 pm Post subject:

hahahahahhahahahahahahahahahhahahahahhahahahahahahhaha

im laughing pretty hard.

theres something so right and so wrong about all that. and its funny.

SWBTSU · Faceplant Joined: 17 Sep 2004 Posts: 35

We just might see a remake of the 1992 election this year, another Bush denied a second term by a democrat who shows him up by serving 2 good terms.

satori* · Posted: Oct 14, 2004 8:22 pm Post subject:

hes got high hopes, high in the sky hopes.. doot da doo

SWBTSU · Faceplant Joined: 17 Sep 2004 Posts: 35

Yeah so did Bush Senior for winning another term but those high hopes let him down hard.

satori* · Posted: Oct 14, 2004 8:29 pm Post subject:

i hope also,

BUUUT IM A CYNIC!

A-skater41 · Pop Shuvit Joined: 18 Sep 2004 Posts: 123 City: Raleigh

B. Bush with D. Nader as VICE. <-------now thats an idea!